Sweden Bans Duel Operator Immortal Snail From Swedish Market

Sweden’s gambling regulator has prohibited the operator of Duel, a crypto casino, from offering games to Swedish players without the local licence required by law, applying fresh pressure to the offshore-licensed side of the crypto-casino market. Spelinspektionen published the order on 28 October 2026 against Immortal Snail LLC, saying the company lacks the authorisation to supply games in Sweden. The decision does not impose a fine, but prohibitions in the regulator’s public register typically serve as evidence in later proceedings and are circulated among payment processors. For readers tracking which crypto casinos take a licensed path and which do not, our hub at safegamingsites.com/crypto-casino sets out what regulated and unregulated crypto gaming looks like today.

What the regulator ordered

The order appears on Spelinspektionen’s news page under the headline, in Swedish, “Immortal Snail LLC far forbud att rikta spel mot Sverige,” or “Immortal Snail LLC gets a ban on targeting gambling at Sweden.” The summary line notes that the company lacks a licence to supply games in Sweden. The prohibition is a cease-and-desist on operating in the Swedish market; it is not a fine and it does not rule on the operator’s status in any other jurisdiction.

The regulator’s Swedish text reads that the authority has prohibited Immortal Snail LLC from providing games in Sweden without the necessary licence. The decision does not state a separate adjudication date; it uses the 28 October 2026 publication date. No deadline for compliance appears in the published news item, and no monetary penalty is listed.

The evidence cited

Trade outlet FairGambling, summarising coverage by SBC News, reported that the order relies on two factual points. First, the Duel website continued to display Swedish as a language option when users logged in from a Swedish IP address. Second, the site still accepted the Swedish krona. The same report said IP blocking had not been implemented for Sweden.

Those facts are evidence, not the legal basis itself. Spelinspektionen’s stated ground is the absence of a Swedish licence; the Swedish-language interface and krona settlement are used to show that the operator is targeting Swedish consumers under the Gaming Act.

The operator’s response

Immortal Snail, responding to the regulator through comments reported by SBC News and relayed by FairGambling, said Swedish is an international language and that Sweden should be IP-blocked, placing the responsibility on consumers’ service providers rather than the site itself. The company also said it should not cease offering Swedish as a language on the website and that it cannot control whether players pay in Swedish kronor. We could not find a primary statement published on the Duel website itself. The company’s licensing jurisdiction is reported by FairGambling as Anjouan, a claim we have not verified against any official register.

A pattern on the same day

Spelinspektionen used the same news slot on 28 October to publish a second prohibition, against Lufilight Ltd. The two orders mark the regulator’s continuing effort to clear the Swedish-facing grey market after a round of similar actions earlier in 2026. Sweden operates a closed-licensing model: an operator either holds a Spelinspektionen licence and pays the corresponding gaming tax, or must not direct gambling at Swedish residents.

What crypto casinos should read from the ruling

For crypto-casino operators that run on offshore licences such as Anjouan or Curacao, the Duel case reinforces three points visible in earlier EU decisions. A domestic-language interface for a specific market, acceptance of that market’s currency, and absence of IP geolocation can together support a finding of targeting, even without paid marketing. A prohibition without a fine is still a reputational and operational cost: payment-service providers often screen the public prohibition lists before onboarding. And crypto wallets do not change the test: Spelinspektionen treats fiat acceptance and language as the deciding signals rather than the funding rail.

Readers tracking parallel crypto enforcement in Asia can also see our report on Thailand’s move against Shuffle.com. The full Swedish-language decision is on the Spelinspektionen news page.

Should an offshore crypto casino that keeps a European language option and a European currency on its site be able to argue it is not targeting that market? Tell us where you draw the line in the comments.

Frequently Asked Questions