SafeGamingSites is an independent iGaming review platform. We do not accept paid placements. If you sign up to a casino through links on this page, we may earn a commission at no cost to you — but the commercial relationship has no influence on our ratings or rankings. Read our affiliate disclosure.
This is the published methodology used by SafeGamingSites to review every crypto casino on the site — including TrustDice, Rollbit, BitStarz, CloudBet, Roobet, Jackbit, Thunderpick, BetPanda, FortuneJack, and BetFury. The process takes between four and six hours per operator, is performed by our Senior Crypto Casino Analyst, and is documented end-to-end so any player can audit how we reached our verdict.
If any element of a published review appears to contradict this methodology, we want to hear about it. Email marketing@safegamingsites.com and we will re-test.
Why we publish our methodology
Online gambling is a Your Money, Your Life (YMYL) topic — Google’s classification for content where bad information can directly harm a reader. We treat that classification seriously. Anyone evaluating a casino review should be able to see how the reviewer reached their conclusion, not just what the conclusion was.
Most crypto casino review sites publish opinions without proof. We publish opinions with documented evidence: real wallet addresses, real deposit timestamps, real withdrawal cycles, screen-recorded support interactions, and signed payout receipts. Every TrustDice, Rollbit, BitStarz, CloudBet, Roobet, Jackbit, Thunderpick, BetPanda, FortuneJack, and BetFury review on SGS has gone through the seven-stage process below.
The seven-stage crypto casino test process
Each operator is tested by our Senior Crypto Casino Analyst across seven sequential stages. The full process takes 4–6 hours of active testing plus a 30-day verification window before publication.
Stage 1: Licence verification
We start by independently verifying the operator’s claimed gaming licence against the regulator’s public registry — Curaçao eGaming, the Anjouan Gaming Authority, Costa Rica’s gaming framework, or whichever jurisdiction the casino operates under. We document the licence number, registered operator entity, and the URL of the registry record. Operators that claim a licence we cannot verify in a public registry receive an automatic Security score of 5.0 or below and a prominent warning at the top of the review.
Stage 2: Account creation and KYC profile
We register a real testing account using a dedicated email address and the operator’s standard sign-up flow. We document every friction point — required fields, captcha behaviour, email verification timing, and whether know-your-customer (KYC) documentation is requested at registration or deferred. For crypto casinos, the KYC trigger point is one of the most important data points players want to know.
Stage 3: Initial deposit testing across multiple chains
We make a minimum deposit and a standard $100 USD-equivalent deposit on each supported cryptocurrency rail. For the crypto cluster, that typically includes Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), Tether (USDT — both TRC20 and ERC20 where supported), Litecoin (LTC), USD Coin (USDC), Solana (SOL), and any chain the operator promotes as a flagship rail. We time the deposit confirmation against the blockchain explorer (we use mempool.space for BTC, etherscan.io for ETH, and tronscan.org for TRC20). Public test wallets are listed at the bottom of this page for auditability.
Stage 4: Gameplay session across categories
We run a 30-minute live testing session across the casino’s main game categories: slots from at least two providers in the operator’s catalogue (typically Pragmatic Play plus one boutique studio), one live dealer table (blackjack or roulette), one provably fair in-house title where available, and the sportsbook if the operator offers one. We test for game library completeness, lag and streaming quality on live tables, and any obvious differences between marketed RTP and observed mechanics. We do not attempt to evaluate true RTP from a 30-minute session — that requires the statistical analysis our Slots & RTP Analyst performs separately.
Stage 5: First withdrawal cycle
We request a withdrawal at the minimum threshold from the deposit balance. We start a timer at submission and stop it when funds confirm at the destination external wallet. We record any KYC escalation triggered by the withdrawal request — what documents were asked for, how the upload flow works, and how long the verification took. This is where many crypto casinos lose points: a fast deposit followed by a slow or friction-heavy withdrawal is a red flag the review will surface clearly.
Stage 6: Customer support contact testing
We submit a real query to the operator’s live chat support during business hours and again during off-hours (typically 3am Singapore time). We document the response time, the agent’s knowledge of the platform’s KYC policy, and whether escalation paths are clear. We also send an identical query via email and measure the response time. Both channels are tested because crypto casinos that only offer live chat without email follow-up are limited in their dispute resolution maturity.
Stage 7: 30-day verification window
After the initial six stages, we hold the draft review for 30 days. During that window, we attempt at least one additional withdrawal and check for any operator-side changes — withdrawn promotions, modified terms and conditions, or sudden licence status changes. Only after the 30-day window do we publish. Every published review carries a “Last verified” date which is updated on a rolling 90-day cycle thereafter (see our editorial policy for the full update cadence).
Test wallets we use (public, auditable)
For transparency, our crypto test wallet addresses are published below. Anyone can verify our deposit and withdrawal activity against the public blockchain. Wallets are rotated annually; the current generation has been active since January 2026.
- Bitcoin (BTC): Address published in the most recent crypto casino review at the bottom of the Methodology section.
- Ethereum (ETH): Address published in each Ethereum-relevant review.
- Tether USDT (TRC20): Address published per operator.
- Solana (SOL): Address published per operator.
If you want to verify a specific deposit or withdrawal cycle, contact the SGS editorial team and we will share the relevant transaction hash. We do not list specific addresses inline here because public listing creates a known target for chain analysis spoofing.
The four scoring dimensions and how they weight
Every crypto casino review on SGS scores the operator on four dimensions. The dimensions and their weights are:
- Security (25% weight): Licence validity, SSL implementation, provably fair mechanics on eligible games, ownership transparency, and historical complaint resolution.
- Bonus & Offer (20% weight): Welcome bonus value, wagering requirements, ongoing promotions, VIP programme depth, and any native token or dividend mechanism.
- Withdrawal Speed (25% weight): Measured payout time per chain, fee transparency, KYC friction at withdrawal, and applicable withdrawal caps.
- Software & Games (30% weight): Library size, provider quality, live casino depth, sportsbook integration where relevant, and provably fair section quality.
The Overall Score is a weighted average of the four dimensions, displayed out of 10. Operators scoring below 7.0 are flagged in the review opening as “not currently recommended”; operators scoring 8.5 or higher are eligible for inclusion in our Best Crypto Casino Malaysia shortlist.
Tools we use
The test process uses the following tools and information sources:
- Blockchain explorers: mempool.space (BTC), etherscan.io (ETH), tronscan.org (TRC20), solscan.io (SOL).
- VPN status: Tests are run from Malaysia or Singapore IP — geographically appropriate to our primary audience. We do not use VPNs to circumvent geographic restrictions.
- Screen recording: Full-session video archived for internal QA and dispute reference.
- Dedicated test devices: One desktop (Chrome, Windows 11) and one mobile (iPhone, Safari) — both with default settings and no ad blockers.
- Stopwatch: Independent timer for support response and withdrawal cycle measurement, not the operator’s UI timer.
- Licence registries: Curaçao eGaming registry, Anjouan Gaming Authority registry, Costa Rica gaming list.
Refresh cadence
Crypto casino reviews are refreshed on a rolling 90-day cycle. The refresh involves: re-verifying licence status against the regulator registry, re-running one withdrawal cycle, re-checking the current welcome bonus terms (these change frequently at crypto casinos), and updating the “Last verified” date. Any material change — for example a licence change, a major operator restructure, or a significant bonus restructure — triggers an immediate re-test outside the 90-day cycle.
Pillar pages like our homepage, best crypto casino Malaysia, and the SGS best-of guides are refreshed on a 30-day cycle.
Who runs this testing programme
The SGS crypto casino testing programme is led by our Senior Crypto Casino Analyst and overseen by the Editor-in-Chief. Every crypto casino review is also reviewed for regulatory compliance — KYC framework references, responsible gambling integration, and licence verification — by our Trust, Safety & Compliance Editor before publication. All three signatures appear in the byline of every published crypto casino review.
Frequently asked questions
Do you accept payment from operators to influence scores?
No. SGS earns commission when a reader signs up to an operator through our affiliate links, but the commercial relationship does not influence ratings or rankings. Operators cannot pay for inclusion in our shortlists, and we do not accept “sponsored” reviews. Read the full affiliate disclosure.
Why don’t you publish the exact test wallet addresses on this page?
Public listing creates a known target for blockchain analysis spoofing. The wallet addresses are published within individual review pages where they were used, and the SGS editorial team will share specific transaction hashes on request for any reader who wants to audit a particular deposit or withdrawal cycle.
How long does the full test take?
Active testing takes 4–6 hours per operator. The 30-day verification window adds calendar time before publication. From the day testing begins to the day a review goes live is typically 35–40 days.
What if an operator changes between tests?
Material changes — licence change, ownership restructure, major bonus modification — trigger an immediate re-test outside the 90-day refresh cycle. The “Last verified” date on every review is the most recent date we confirmed the review’s claims still held.
Can I request a re-test if I believe a review is out of date?
Yes. Email marketing@safegamingsites.com with the casino name and what you believe needs re-verification, and we will prioritise it in the next refresh cycle.
Editorial accountability
SGS is committed to honest, evidence-based reviews. If we make a mistake in a published review — wrong licence number, incorrect bonus terms, outdated withdrawal speed — please email us and we will issue a public correction. Corrections are logged on our editorial policy page.
This methodology page is updated whenever our testing process changes. Last updated: June 2026.
